| |
|
ISSUES
Two Recent Views of Population Health:
"We propose that
devotion to the best medical interests of each individual patient
be replaced with an ethic of devotion to the best medical
interests of the group for which the physician is personally
responsible. Physicians who compromise optimal treatment for one
patient in order to do more good for other patients can still
profess strong devotion to patient welfare. The shift from
individual health to group health is consistent with the focus of
many HMOs on the health of the populations they serve and with the
basis on which HMOs and providers are increasingly being judged
for quality of care."
Mark A. Hall, JD, and Robert A. Berenson, MD,
The Annuals of Internal
Medicine, March 1,1998.
"You cannot practice on the
individual and serve the collectivity and be the equivalent
servant of both at the same time."
Daniel P. Sulmasy, MD, PhD, lead investigator
of a study of 1,549 young physicians regarding whether doctors
should stay with the Hippocratic Oath to individual patients or
move to management of health care resources for the collective
good. "Physicians torn between two loyalties," Vida Foubister,
American Medical News, May 15, 2000.
Results of Sulmasy's
"Collective Good" Study:
17% - said it is ethically acceptable to use financial
incentives to encourage limits on medical treatment
81% - said undivided loyalty to the patient had decreased over
the past 10 years.
51% - said their own patients' trust in them had diminished
during the past 5 years.
|
 |
Citizens' Council on Health Care
1954 University Avenue West, Suite 8, St. Paul, MN 55104
Phone: 651.646.8935 / Fax: 651.646.0100, e-mail
|
| |